![]() ![]() It is of no consequence to a human if an input field has moved a few pixels or a label has changed from “UserName” to “Username”, but even innocuous changes such as those can cause automation to no longer find what it expects in the window, requiring tremendous effort to maintain automated tests.īroadly speaking, applications with a graphical user interface fall into two types: client applications, those that run on a user’s computer, and web applications, those that run on a remote server and are accessed with a client browser. Even small changes in a UI, though, can easily break automation testing. Automated UI testing would be great-if the UI never changed but, particularly during development of a new product, the user interface frequently and constantly changes that is just the nature of the beast. Automation attempts to replace humans with programs that do the clicking and the typing. So each new release of a product requires hoards of manual testers clicking and typing away to regression test the UI. User-Interface (UI) testing, however, has challenges all its own, and is often looked upon with trepidation because it is difficult to automate. Some testing categories, such as unit testing, are well-supported by tools. Retargeting Environments with Selenium Sushi.Restore the Balance between Selenium IDE and Selenium RC. ![]() Web Testing with Selenium Sushi: A Practical Guide and Toolset - Simple Talk ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |